Mal wieder absoluter Bullshit und nur Geldmacherrei

Meine erste von 2015 geht auch noch einwandfrei
obwohl sie aussieht wie Schmirgelpapier ( bin Schlosser )

Ja netter Gedanke aber ich muss sage die Uhr ist wirklich robust, die schweißspritzer muss ich halt ab undzu abschaben , ich brauche h die Uhr weil ich sonst meist das Händi nicht höre ( lautstärke und so 😁

Meine erste von 2015 geht auch noch einwandfrei
obwohl sie aussieht wie Schmirgelpapier ( bin Schlosser )

Meine erste von 2015 lebt heute noch Fehlerfrei in zweiter Hand.
Mit der neuen Series-3 gibts bisher auch keine Probleme.

Die sollten lieber mal was arbeiten gehen.

In Deutschland muß man nicht mal Angst vor einer Klage haben, wenn man vorsätzlich Fehler in tausende Produkte einbaut.

Du beziehst dich auf Apple, oder?

Mal wieder. Die Meldung suggeriert, dass alle Watches kaputt sind oder gehen. Folglich müssten alle zurückgegangen sein. Da das nicht so ist und meine persönliche Erfahrung mit mittlerweile 3 Watches stets fehlerfrei war - so what?

[…]

Apple started selling the Watches in April 2015, when it introduced its Series 0 Watches to consumers. Since April 2015, Defendant has released two additional "generations" of the Apple Watch: the Series 1 and Series 2 Watches; and the Series 3 Watch.

The Watches all contain the same defect and/or flaw, which causes the screens on the Watches to crack, shatter, or detach from the body of the Watch (the "Defect"), through no fault of the wearer, oftentimes only days or weeks after purchase.

Apple knew that the Watches were defective at or before the time it began selling them to the public. Furthermore, consumers complained to Apple about the Defect almost immediately after Apple released the Series 0, Series 1, Series 2, and Series 3 Watches.

Shortly after the release of the Series 0 Watch in April 2015, consumers began to complain that the screens on their Watches were spontaneously detaching from the body of their Watches.

Apple has persistently denied any widespread issue with Series 0 Watches, but in April 2017, Apple acknowledged a swelling battery defect in certain Series 0 Watches and extended its Limited Warranty for qualifying Series 0 Watches from one year to three years.

Apple began to sell its Series 1 and Series 2 Watches in September 2016. Shortly thereafter, consumers who purchased the Series 1 and Series 2 Watches complained that the screens on their Series 1 and Series 2 Watches had cracked, shattered, or completely detached from the body of their Watches. Like their Series 0 brethren, these consumers took their defective Watches to Apple Stores, contacted Apple Support, and posted their complaints on the "Communities" forum on apple.com.

Apple has persistently denied any widespread issue with Series 1 or Series 2 Watches, but, upon information and belief, in April 2018, Apple acknowledged a swelling battery defect in certain Series 2 Watches and extended its Limited Warranty for qualifying Series 0 Watches from one year to three years.

Apple started selling its Series 3 Watch in September 2017. Shortly thereafter, consumers who purchased the Series 3 Watch reported that the screens on their Watches were cracking, shattering, or detaching from the body of their Watches, and lodged their complaints with Apple in the manners described above.

Since 2015, Apple has sold millions of Watches with the Defect throughout the United States, and either knew, or should have known, that the Watches contain the Defect and are not fit for their intended purpose. Nonetheless, Apple has actively concealed and failed to disclose the Defect to Plaintiff and Class members prior to, at, or after the time of purchase.

Further, Apple's conduct, when confronted with the Defect, indicates that its internal policy is to deny the existence of the Defect, claim the Defect is the result of "accidental damage" caused by consumers, and then refuse to honor its Limited Warranty on those grounds. Without Limited Warranty coverage, consumers are forced to incur the significant expense of repairing or replacing their defective Watches.

Apple knew that purchasers of the Watches would reasonably expect the screens to function in a predictable and expected manner during normal use, and Plaintiff and other consumers have precisely that expectation. Also, Apple knew that purchasers of the Watches would reasonably expect the Defect—when it manifested itself—to be covered under its Limited Warranty, and again, Plaintiff and other consumers did have that expectation.

Had Plaintiff and other Class members known about the Defect at the time of purchase, they would not have bought the Watches, or would have paid less for them.

As a result of the Defect in the Watches and monetary costs associated with repair, replacement, or lost use of the Watches, Plaintiff and Class members have suffered injury in fact, incurred damages, and have otherwise been harmed by Apple's conduct.

[…]

Ich trage meine Apple Warch seit 2015 jeden Tag (also drei Jahre genau!) und ich habe nichts von diesem Fehler gemerkt…